|  e-ISSN: 2717-6886

Original article | International Journal of Language and Education Research 2024, Vol. 6(2) 1-18

Using Padlet Based on Social Constructivism to Enhance English Writing Skill of Thai Students in Higher Level

Bundit Anuyahong

pp. 1 - 18   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijler.2024.1059.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2407-25-0004

Published online: August 29, 2024  |   Number of Views: 33  |  Number of Download: 116


Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of using Padlet, a social constructivism-based platform, in enhancing the English writing skills of Thai students in higher education. The research objectives are to examine the impact of using Padlet on the English writing abilities of undergraduate students in Thailand, compare their writing achievement before and after participating in the Padlet-based writing activities, and compare the English writing achievement of the experimental and controlled groups. A sample of 20 undergraduate students was selected through simple random sampling. The pre-post English writing test, English writing lesson plans based on constructivism, and English writing ability evaluation form were used as instruments in the study. The experimental process involved using six lesson plans in the first semester, followed by evaluation of the subjects' writing competence using the English writing ability evaluation form after each lesson. The data were analyzed using mean scores, standard deviation, percentage, effect size, and t-test. The findings indicate that the English writing dexterity of the undergraduate students was at a good level, and there was a significant improvement in their English writing abilities after participating in the Padlet-based writing activities. The experimental group's English writing dexterity was found to be significantly higher than the controlled group.

Keywords: Padlet, Social Constructivism, English Writing Skill, Thai Students.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Anuyahong, B. (2024). Using Padlet Based on Social Constructivism to Enhance English Writing Skill of Thai Students in Higher Level . International Journal of Language and Education Research, 6(2), 1-18. doi: 10.29329/ijler.2024.1059.1

Harvard
Anuyahong, B. (2024). Using Padlet Based on Social Constructivism to Enhance English Writing Skill of Thai Students in Higher Level . International Journal of Language and Education Research, 6(2), pp. 1-18.

Chicago 16th edition
Anuyahong, Bundit (2024). "Using Padlet Based on Social Constructivism to Enhance English Writing Skill of Thai Students in Higher Level ". International Journal of Language and Education Research 6 (2):1-18. doi:10.29329/ijler.2024.1059.1.

References

    Abdul-Kareem, J. (2014). The effectiveness of e-learning in teaching English Writing Skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(3), 60-68.

    Ahmed, A. (2021). Padlet as a tool for promoting writing development among Libyan EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(3), 119-129.

    Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.

    Chen, C., & Kuo, C. (2016). Enhancing English Writing Skills through Technology Integration. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 68-79.

    Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37(2), 322-329.

    Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213-220. doi: 10.1037/h0026256

    Duffy, P. (2011). Engaging the YouTube Google-Eyed Generation: Strategies for Using Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 9(2), 139-150.

    El Tantawi, M. M. (2017). Using Padlet in EFL writing classrooms. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 69-81.

    Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge University Press.

    Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2018). Teaching L2 writing in the twenty-first century: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Routledge.

    Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

    Giri, N. P., & Ranjit, Y. S. (2018). Problems faced by Nepalese students in learning English language. Journal of NELTA Surkhet, 6(1), 1-9.

    Hsiao, Y. T., & Chang, C. H. (2018). Enhancing college students' learning performance and engagement through digital storytelling and Padlet. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(7), 1004-1024.

    Huang, C., & Lee, L. (2020). Enhancing college students’ writing with peer feedback via Padlet. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 13(2), 57-74.

    Huang, Y., Huang, H., & Chen, Y. (2017). Technology-enhanced language learning for college students in Taiwan: An empirical study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1675-1692. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00678a

    Jaturong, J., & Wongwanich, S. (2021). Enhancing English Writing Skills of Thai Students in Higher Education Through Padlet Based on Social Constructivism. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 109-124.

    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Pearson.

    Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013). The effects of blog peer feedback on writing competence of EFL undergraduate students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 426-441.

    Khalil, M., Alghamdi, R., & Alabdulaziz, M. (2020). The effectiveness of Padlet on writing performance of English language learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1585-1604.

    Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

    Kouraogo, O. A., & Bado, A. R. (2020). Investigating undergraduate students' writing skills in English as a foreign language. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(2), 84-98.

    Lai, C., & Li, Y. (2018). The effects of Padlet on EFL writing: A case study. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 103-110.

    Laufer, B. (1994). The effect of dictionary training on reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 295-306.

    Lee, J., & Kim, C. (2018). The effectiveness of Padlet for writing instruction in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(2), 1-16.

    McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031

    Padlet. (2022). What is Padlet? Retrieved from https://padlet.com/about

    Phinprapha, C. (2015). Improving Writing Ability of Thai EFL Students through the Process Approach: A Classroom Action Research. English Language Teaching, 8(11), 87-98.

    Pimdee, P. (2015). An Investigation of Writing Problems Faced by Thai English Major Students. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 58-65.

    Tang, J., & Sze, C. (2021). Enhancing writing proficiency through Padlet-based activities in Hong Kong secondary schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(3), 261-271.

    Thaweerat, S. (2000). The development of English writing ability test for Thai university students. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).

    Thaweerat, T. (2000). A comparative study of the scores of the writing proficiency tests and the scores of the college English entrance test. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 18(1), 35-52.

    Thongmak, M., & Janpanich, S. (2019). Enhancing collaborative writing skills using Padlet: A case study of Thai undergraduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(6), 1269-1277.

    Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67.

    Van Dijk, M., & Kerkhoff, S. (2017). The effectiveness of Padlet as a tool for collaborative writing in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), 293-310.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Wang, H. Y., & Chen, C. C. (2015). Online peer feedback and learning in a blended writing environment: Effects on writing quality, revision, and learning perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 428-441.

    Wang, Y. (2021). Improving Chinese EFL learners’ writing through Padlet-based peer feedback. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1280-1291.

    Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press.

    Wongsothorn, A. (1995). Validation of the English language proficiency assessment (ELPA) for university entrance in Thailand. Language Testing, 12(1), 72-86.