Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Language and Education Research 2025, Vol. 7(3) 250-271
Evaluation of a Visual-Supported Digital Dictionary for A1-Level Teaching of Turkish as a Foreign Language Based on Teachers’ Views
pp. 250 - 271
Publish Date: December 31, 2025 | Single/Total View: 0/0 | Single/Total Download: 0/0
Abstract
The aim of the current study is to evaluate the perspectives of teachers concerning a digitally-supported and visually-supported Turkish A1-Level Dictionary for students of Turkish as a foreign language. Vocabulary knowledge at the beginning stages of second or foreign language acquisition has been identified as a critical component to the successful progression of the learner's language acquisition process; particularly when the learner's beginning vocabulary knowledge is restricted. As the interest in the utilization of digital materials that provide visual support to the teaching-learning process continues to grow in educational research, there has been increasing interest in these materials as a tool to enhance vocabulary knowledge acquisition. This study used a qualitative approach to examine the perspectives of six teachers who are experienced in teaching Turkish as a foreign language and are currently instructing at the A1 level. The data collection methods included semi-structured teacher interviews, observational data and comments from the teachers' written feedback and were analyzed using thematic analysis. The dictionary was created to be a tool that would present the words (and their definitions), with accompanying images, pronunciation and example sentences, as a whole unit. The results of the study indicated that the teachers had positive views of the dictionary concerning its usability, accessibility, and functional value to the classroom. Many of the participants emphasized that the visual representation of vocabulary facilitated the vocabulary learning process, while others noted limitations in the dictionary including alignment of visuals to the correct word, clarity regarding which words were selected, and the extent of the dictionary's use. In general, the results suggest the potential benefits of utilizing a visually-supported digital dictionary in the instruction of Turkish as a foreign language at the A1 Level.
Keywords: Digital dictionary, A1 level Turkish learning, visual support, user experience, language learning motivation.
APA 7th edition
Atmaca, S., & Kana, F. (2025). Evaluation of a Visual-Supported Digital Dictionary for A1-Level Teaching of Turkish as a Foreign Language Based on Teachers’ Views. International Journal of Language and Education Research, 7(3), 250-271.
Harvard
Atmaca, S. and Kana, F. (2025). Evaluation of a Visual-Supported Digital Dictionary for A1-Level Teaching of Turkish as a Foreign Language Based on Teachers’ Views. International Journal of Language and Education Research, 7(3), pp. 250-271.
Chicago 16th edition
Atmaca, Sena and Fatih Kana (2025). "Evaluation of a Visual-Supported Digital Dictionary for A1-Level Teaching of Turkish as a Foreign Language Based on Teachers’ Views". International Journal of Language and Education Research 7 (3):250-271.
A1 Turkish Digital Dictionary. (2024). https://sozlukv2.canakkaleseo.com.tr/ (Accessed: 01.04.2024).
Aksan, D. (1995). Language in all its aspects: An outline of linguistics. Turkish Language Association Publications, Ankara.
Arslan, M., & Gürdal, A. (2012). Teaching Turkish vocabulary to foreigners through visual and auditory materials. Kastamonu Education Journal, 20(1), 255–270.
Barham, K. A. (2017). The use of electronic dictionaries in the language classroom: The views of language learners. In The Second International Conference for Learning and Teaching in the Digital World – Smart Learning (March 29–30, 2017). An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573437.pdf (Accessed: 15.08.2024).
Bulut, S. (2021). Contributions to the compilation dictionary from the dialects of Alanya (Antalya). The Journal of Academic Social Science, (111), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.48300
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699928 (Accessed: 15.08.2024).
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg. Available at: www.coe.int/lang-cefr (Accessed: 15.08.2024).
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Çalışkan, E. (2022). The effects of digital dictionary applications on reading comprehension, vocabulary, and retention in teaching Turkish as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Institute of Graduate Studies, Antalya.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Elbir, B., & Yıldız, H. (2013). Dictionary use and lexicography in Turkish teaching. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (11), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.385
Karadağ, Ö. (2013). Vocabulary teaching. Kriter Publishing, İstanbul.
Karatay, H. (2007). Vocabulary teaching. Journal of Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education, 27(1), 141–153.
Kocaer, A. (2022). An analysis of a visual dictionary in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: The case of “Dil-Fi Visual Dictionary and Activity Book for Foreigners (A1–A2)” (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Institute of Graduate Studies, İstanbul.
Kuzu, A., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2011). Design-based research and its use in designing and developing learning environments. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 1(1), 19–35.
Liu, T. C., Fan, M. H. M., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of digital dictionary format on incidental acquisition of spelling knowledge and cognitive load during second language learning: Click-on vs. key-in dictionaries. Computers & Education, 70, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.001
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
Memiş, M. (2019). Determining the vocabulary teaching strategies used by teachers of Turkish as a foreign language. Bayburt Faculty of Education Journal, 14(28), 275–300.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.25
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569057
Walker, A., & White, G. (2013). Technology enhanced language learning: Connecting theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
Woo, Y., Herrington, J. A., Agostinho, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Implementing authentic tasks in web-based learning environments. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 3. https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/article-downloads/eqm0735.pdf (Accessed: 05.06.2024).
Yalçın, F. (2022). The contribution of digital presentation materials to Syrian students’ recognition of Turkish culture in teaching Turkish as a foreign language (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publishing, Ankara.
Yılmaz, E. (2009). Studies on Turkey Turkish. Pegem Academy Publishing, Ankara.
