Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Language and Education Research 2026, Vol. 8(1) 67-80
Perceptions of Implementing AI-Based Speaking Assessment Tools in Legal English Education: A Mixed-Methods Study among Lecturers and Students at Hanoi Law University
pp. 67 - 80
Publish Date: April 30, 2026 | Single/Total View: 0/0 | Single/Total Download: 0/0
Abstract
This study investigated perceptions of AI-based speaking assessment tools in legal English education at Hanoi Law University (HLU) in Vietnam, addressing a gap in discipline-specific applications within non-native EFL contexts. Employing a concurrent mixed-methods design, quantitative surveys were administered to 105 second-year legal English students, while semi-structured interviews were conducted with 6 lecturers to explore views on AI's role in evaluating legal discourse. Findings revealed positive perceptions of AI's efficiency (mean = 4.23 on a 5-point scale) and skill improvement potential (mean = 3.98), with perceptions varying significantly by student performance levels (ANOVA: F(2,102) = 5.24, p = 0.007 for feedback immediacy). Lecturers expressed optimism for AI's immediacy and advocated hybrid approaches. However, results are limited by self-reported data, a single-institution sample, and potential response bias, restricting generalizability. Future research should incorporate objective measures and multi-site designs for broader validation.
Keywords: AI-based assessment, automated speaking evaluation, English for specific purposes (ESP), legal English, higher education, student perceptions
APA 7th edition
Anh, N.H., & Hong, T.N.T. (2026). Perceptions of Implementing AI-Based Speaking Assessment Tools in Legal English Education: A Mixed-Methods Study among Lecturers and Students at Hanoi Law University. International Journal of Language and Education Research, 8(1), 67-80.
Harvard
Anh, N. and Hong, T. (2026). Perceptions of Implementing AI-Based Speaking Assessment Tools in Legal English Education: A Mixed-Methods Study among Lecturers and Students at Hanoi Law University. International Journal of Language and Education Research, 8(1), pp. 67-80.
Chicago 16th edition
Anh, Nguyen Hai and Thu Nguyen Thi Hong (2026). "Perceptions of Implementing AI-Based Speaking Assessment Tools in Legal English Education: A Mixed-Methods Study among Lecturers and Students at Hanoi Law University". International Journal of Language and Education Research 8 (1):67-80.
Bennett, R. E., & Zhang, M. (2022). Automated scoring in educational assessment: A review of validity and fairness issues. Educational Assessment, 27(4), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2022.2040932
Bhatia, V. K. (2021). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carless, D., & Lam, R. (2020). Integrating assessment for learning, teaching, and student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 542–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1631320
Chapelle, C. A., & Voss, E. (2021). Validity argument for AI-based language assessment. Language Testing, 38(3), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220987923
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Harding, L., Alderson, J. C., & Brunfaut, T. (2021). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language. Routledge.
Huang, X., Chen, S., & Xu, Y. (2023). Automated speaking assessment: Challenges of evaluating discourse-level competence. ReCALL, 35(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000085
Jegede, O. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence and English language learning: Exploring the roles of AI-driven tools in personalizing learning and providing instant feedback. Universal Library of Languages and Literatures, 1(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.70315/uloap.ullli.2024.0102002
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Artificial intelligence in language education: A systematic review of AI-driven tools for speaking and writing assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1892–1915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1984312
Lai, J. W. M. (2017). Technology acceptance model for the use of AI in education: An updated review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1571–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9542-6
Lee, J. (2022). Human vs. AI: The limitations of AI in assessing pragmatic competence in EFL contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 1764–1782. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1950178
Lim, S., & Park, H. (2023). Evaluating AI-based assessment tools for professional English: A case study of business and legal English. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00189-4
Lu, X., & Hua, X. (2022). Automated speaking assessment: A review of recent advances and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1500–1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1902232
Lu, X., & Hua, Y. (2022). Students’ perceptions of automated feedback in speaking tasks. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00151-w
Nguyen, T. T., & Le, Q. H. (2023). AI-enhanced learning and assessment in Vietnamese EFL classrooms: Opportunities and barriers. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00170-9
Shin, D., & Park, M. (2024). Assessing professional English competence: AI-based tools in business and legal contexts. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00203-3
Tse, A. C., & Chan, K. (2023). Perceptions of AI-based feedback in ESP classrooms: A case study of business English learners. English for Specific Purposes, 70, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.003
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Wang, L., & Harding, L. (2022). Transparency in AI scoring: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Language Assessment Quarterly, 19(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2051135
Xie, Q., Chen, Z., & Sun, Y. (2023). The role of AI in speaking assessment: Insights from automated scoring systems. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.125/LLT.2023.001
Yuan, K., & Wang, J. (2023). Accent bias in AI-based oral proficiency assessment: A critical review. TESOL Quarterly, 57(2), 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3214
Zechner, K., Higgins, D., Xi, X., & Williamson, D. M. (2009). Automatic scoring of non-native spontaneous speech in tests of spoken English. Speech Communication, 51(10), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2008.12.004
Zhang, J., & Zechner, K. (2020). Automated speaking scoring systems: Advances and challenges. ETS Research Report Series, 2020(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12312
Zou, D., Kong, L., & Lee, C. (2023). AI-powered language assessment: Student perspectives and ethical considerations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2049811
